This is a republishing of an article I wrote for the Strange Bedfellows project. The original url is here.
I have been working with Professor William Bowen on an initiative to create a Digital Humanities Research Centre on the University of Toronto Scarborough‘s (UTSC) campus, much like the HRC on the University of York’s campus. While the concept of such a centre is very nascent at UTSC, many of the faculty and staff I have talked to seem to share an idea of this centre ultimately being a repository for all of the digital work going on at UTSC whether that means a collection of data points or contacts for various digital tasks. Due to this, I have been researching a lot about digital humanities centres, including their various functions, ideologies, and output, and I have found that a lot of scholarly writings directly address this idea of a Humanities Research Centre as a digital archive.
The idea of an DHRC and its role as a central archive is complicated, in part because its nature as a digital archive. Bill Bowen was recently at a conference in Cuba that examined the nature of digital artifacts and their place in digital records/cyberinfrastructure. When Bill came back, he mentioned that it was very interesting to be at a conference talking about digital technologies when he could use so few of them there. This got me thinking about digital technology and its innate intangibility. For instance, what does the complicated structure and high level of organization of a digital database matter if you cannot even access a computer?